Coronavirus Latest News

Coronavirus live news: prosecutors question Italian PM on decision not to lock down earlier

Canada’s two largest grocery chains have announced plans to wind down ‘emergency’ pay for employees, despite taking in record profits during the ongoing coronavirus pandemic— a move that has prompted outrage from union leaders.

Loblaws and Metro have both rolled out a C$2/hour premium during the pandemic in recognition that employees faced increased risk as front line workers.

“Our supermarkets and pharmacies are performing well,” Loblaws head Galen Weston said in late March, when the pay increase was rolled out. “And the leaders in our business wanted to make sure that a significant portion of that benefit would go straight into the pockets of the incredible people on the front line.”

As of 13 June, both companies will end the pay increase. They will pay out a bonus to each employee: full time workers at Loblaws will receive C$140 and those at Metro will be given C$200.

Loblaws, which owns a number of grocery store brands across the country, recorded windfall profits in its first quarter, up to C$240m from C$198m the same quarter last year.

Metro also reported a surge in profit, banking C$176m in its most recent quarter, compared to C$122m the year before.

The decision to wind down pay has outraged union leaders, who say the pandemic is not over and the danger to workers remains present.

Jerry Dias, president of Unifor, said in a statement:


The pandemic is not over. The danger has not passed. These workers are no less at risk and are no less essential today than they were yesterday. There is no justification for ending pandemic pay now, or ever.

Retail workers have always been essential, and they have always deserved much better. The fact is, the pandemic did not make these workers essential and did not create the inequities in retail, it simply exposed them.

Your questions answered on what type of mask to wear to cut the risk of getting Covid-19:

Does it matter what sort of mask you wear?

Yes. Different types of mask offer different levels of protection. Surgical grade N95 respirators offer the highest level of protection against Covid-19 infection, followed by surgical grade masks.

However, these masks are costly, in limited supply, contribute to landfill waste and are uncomfortable to wear for long periods.

So even countries that have required the public to wear face masks have generally suggested such masks should be reserved for health workers or those at particularly high risk.

The evidence on the protective value of single-use paper masks or reusable cloth coverings is less clear, but still suggests that face masks can contribute to reducing transmission of Covid-19. Analysis by the Royal Society said this included homemade cloth face masks.

Are paper surgical single-use masks better or is a cloth mask OK?

The evidence on any mask use, outside of surgical masks, is still emerging: there appears to be some benefit, but the exact parameters of which masks are the best and the extent to which they protect the wearer or those around them are still being figured out.

A tighter fitting around the face is probably better, but the CDC suggests any covering, including a bandana, is better than none.

One US study investigated which household materials best removed particles of 0.3-1.0 microns in diameter, the typical size of viruses and bacteria, and concluded that good options include vacuum cleaner bags, heavyweight “quilter’s cotton” or multiple layers of material. Scarves and bandana material were less effective, but still captured a fraction of particles.

Read the original article at The Guardian

Related Articles

Back to top button