Coronavirus Latest News

UK coronavirus: France could quarantine British visitors; UK reports 1,441 new cases in a day — as it happened

They are a lifeline for parents: somewhere affordable where children can exercise and play. But as soft play centres prepare to reopen on Saturday, industry experts have warned that many will shortly close their doors for good because of new government regulations.

Janice Dunphy, chair of the British Association of Leisure Parks, Piers and Attraction’s family entertainment centres’ committee, has said she is considering resigning over guidance issued by the government under Balppa’s name but without consultation over a crucial additional section.


We consulted with the government over the guidance and were happy with the version we had all agreed. But when they released it last night, it contained this extra regulation which we had no knowledge of.

This single section is going to lead to the closure of hundreds of soft play centres.

It’s a slow death for our industry. There’s no way we can survive this new regulation.

The controversial section in the operational guidance for England concerns ventilation in the centres. To achieve sufficient air flow to protect customers from infection from Covid-19, it states: “The maximum occupancy of each indoor facility should be limited by providing a minimum of 100 sq ft per person.”

Paul Kelly, CEO of Balppa, said that the regulation at issue, which he only saw a few hours before it was publicly released by the government, was inserted by Public Health England (PHE).

“We’re not ventilation experts and so we knew that PHE would be putting their expertise about the issue into the guidance, and that their input would be non-negotiable,” he said. “We will now put this guidance out to our members and, if any sticking points emerge, will go back to government and ask if there’s any movement possible.”

Rates of people testing positive for Covid-19 in England still appear to be levelling off, the latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) suggest.

The new data, which covers the period from 3 to 9 August 2020, reveals about one in 1,900 people in the community are now thought to have the virus, with an estimated 3,800 new cases per day.

While these data are similar to last week’s figures, the ONS warns they are not directly comparable, as the modelling approach has changed.

Nonetheless the ONS says the results indicate no clear sign of a rise or fall in rates of people testing positive for Covid-19 in England since the week before.

“There is some evidence of a small increase in the percentage of people testing positive for Covid-19 in July, following a low point in June, but this appears to have now levelled off,” the ONS team report.

Airbnb’s decision to restrict under-25s in Britain, France and Spain from renting homes could leave the company open to legal challenges under discrimination laws, experts have said.

The company announced that as part of its crackdown on rowdy parties it would begin testing in Britain, France and Spain a ban on under-25s with less than three positive ratings from renting entire homes close to where they live.

A lawyer has said that the ruling could, however, potentially be in breach of the Equalities Act 2010, which protects people from discrimination based on their age.

Mark Woloshak, head of the dispute resolution department at Slater and Gordon, said:


There are certain protected characteristics that you cannot discriminate against and one of those is age. A good example of this is car insurance. It used to be that companies would charge young men higher premiums because they were considered worse drivers and more likely to get into accidents. So if you were under 25 and a man you would pay more, but it was seen as illegal.

Airbnb could change it in such a way that everyone has to have positive reviews to rent a whole house but they would not be keen on that as it would limit the amount of houses they put through … If the question was that you cannot rent due to negative responses they would have more of an argument.

But it imposes something on them [under-25s] and makes it more difficult than would ordinarily be the case, based on a person’s age so that falls outside the Equalities Act.

Read the original article at The Guardian

Related Articles

Back to top button